Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Various improvements #110

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 31, 2023
Merged

Various improvements #110

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 31, 2023

Conversation

ArnoStrouwen
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 28, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (039f31e) 83.76% compared to head (d109635) 82.72%.
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #110      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.76%   82.72%   -1.04%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines         351      359       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits          294      297       +3     
- Misses         57       62       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@isaacsas
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

TimerOutputs = "0.5"
Test = "1"
julia = "1.6"
julia = "1.10"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ChrisRackauckas is SciML now moving to Julia 1.10 and greater going forward or should this be a lower version cap?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Note that there's big discussions of v1.10 being the new LTS. It's not official yet, but we needed to bump a few things (many libraries could no longer support pre-1.9) so since it's 95% sure v1.10 is the new LTS, we're just going to bump it all to v1.10 and hope and pray. If we need to backport any fixes we can but this should drastically simplify things.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, thanks for letting me know. I'll keep this in mind going forward across libraries.

@isaacsas
Copy link
Member

I want to merge Torkel's PR first so he doesn't have to deal with rebasing, but then I'll merge this.

@isaacsas isaacsas closed this Dec 30, 2023
@isaacsas isaacsas reopened this Dec 30, 2023
@isaacsas isaacsas merged commit 10d7d0e into SciML:master Dec 31, 2023
11 of 14 checks passed
@ArnoStrouwen ArnoStrouwen deleted the various branch January 1, 2024 00:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants