Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sap Authentication bypass fixed in SAP Note 2258786 #75

Merged

Conversation

beserkerbob
Copy link
Contributor

Added a new folder in the Other directory for SAP-specific checks. This check performs a check for an authentication bypass. Which is a known and common issue for SAP applications. Advise to fix is documented in SAP Note 2258786. Which is also mentioned in the bcheck.

The authentication bypass is that normally /sap/admin/public/default.html should be requested and would result in a login screen. however index.html would directly go to the given view. Leaking inside urls, installed patches and other useful information.

…thentication bypass check Which is a known common issue for SAP application. Advise to fix with SAP Note 2258786
Copy link
Collaborator

@PortSwiggerWiener PortSwiggerWiener left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@aborshik aborshik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

@aborshik aborshik merged commit 3200bf6 into PortSwigger:main Aug 3, 2023
2 checks passed
@michael-eaton-portswigger

@beserkerbob As a contributor to our GitHub repository, we would like to invite you to our closed Discord community.

It is a place where passionate Burp users, including people who directly work on building and developing Burp here at PortSwigger, can talk about the tooling and web security in general.

If you would like to join, please email us at [email protected] and we will send over an invite link.

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants