Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Aruco/Multitag 36h11 support #981

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Oct 30, 2023
Merged

Aruco/Multitag 36h11 support #981

merged 11 commits into from
Oct 30, 2023

Conversation

srimanachanta
Copy link
Member

@srimanachanta srimanachanta commented Oct 25, 2023

  • Aruco pipeline now infers tag width from tag family like the AprilTag pipeline
  • Removes unused Aruco and 200mm AprilTag models
  • VisionEstimation.estimateCamPosePNP() now requires a target model instead of assuming 16h5
    • Multitarget pipeline similarly infers target model of tag family now
    • PhotonPoseEstimator can have target model set for on-rio multitarget

@srimanachanta srimanachanta requested a review from a team as a code owner October 25, 2023 03:29
@amquake amquake changed the title Remove Aruco Target Models Aruco/Multitag 36h11 support Oct 25, 2023
@amquake amquake added this to the 2024 Beta milestone Oct 25, 2023
photon-client/src/components/dashboard/tabs/PnPTab.vue Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
/**
* Set the TargetModel representing the tags being detected. This is used for on-rio multitag.
*
* @param tagModel E.g. {@link TargetModel#kAprilTag16h5}.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this link is broken? Not sure, coz it doesn't include the size like we do in TargetModel above

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is photon-targeting's TargetModel, not photon-core's. We should see if merging these is possible.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah totally. Or rename one of them lol

@mcm001
Copy link
Contributor

mcm001 commented Oct 27, 2023

Java lint, but otherwise LGTM

@mcm001 mcm001 merged commit 0898dfe into PhotonVision:master Oct 30, 2023
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants