Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating docs for itemId for Mail and Calendar #2400

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vikramtha
Copy link
Contributor

@vikramtha vikramtha commented Jul 10, 2024

Description

Added some more docs for the itemId for Mail and Calendar Capability so devs know what type of ID is accepted and how to go from Graph REST Id to EWS Id

If this Pull Request should close/resolve any issues when merged, use the special syntax for that here.

Main changes in the PR:

  1. Doc changes

Validation

Validation performed:

  1. None

Unit Tests added:

Not needed doc change

End-to-end tests added:

No

Additional Requirements

Change file added:

Ensure the change file meets the formatting requirements.

Yes

@vikramtha vikramtha requested a review from a team as a code owner July 10, 2024 21:46
@vikramtha vikramtha enabled auto-merge (squash) July 10, 2024 21:50
@@ -84,7 +84,11 @@ export namespace calendar {

/** Open calendar item parameters. */
export interface OpenCalendarItemParams {
/** An unique base64-encoded string id that represents the event's unique identifier of the calendar item to be opened. */
/** An unique base64-encoded string id that represents the itemId or messageId.
* The only acceptable id for this itemId is the EWS (Exchange Web Services) ID. However,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

EWS (Exchange Web Services) ID

Is there a public documentation link that describes what the EWS ID is? Your explanation for how to create it from the graph ID is very helpful and probably sufficient but if we have a doc link that would be a good addition.

Copy link
Contributor

@AE-MS AE-MS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one question

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants