-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 188
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Promoted constructor properties should not be doubled, fix #784 #785
Open
Grundik
wants to merge
2
commits into
Ocramius:2.15.x
Choose a base branch
from
Grundik:fix-784
base: 2.15.x
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
29 changes: 29 additions & 0 deletions
29
tests/ProxyManagerTestAsset/ClassWithPromotedProperties.php
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ | ||
<?php | ||
|
||
declare(strict_types=1); | ||
|
||
namespace ProxyManagerTestAsset; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Class with a promoted constructor properties | ||
* | ||
* @license MIT | ||
*/ | ||
class ClassWithPromotedProperties | ||
{ | ||
public function __construct( | ||
protected int $amount, | ||
protected ?int $nullableAmount | ||
) { | ||
} | ||
|
||
public function getAmount(): int | ||
{ | ||
return $this->amount; | ||
} | ||
|
||
public function getNullableAmount(): ?int | ||
{ | ||
return $this->nullableAmount; | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't this behavior be fixed in
laminas/laminas-code
, if we're required to copy parameter declarations twice to fix it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think laminas-code does its best: it detects property promotion, and copies that as requested. But since we are doing inheritance, we dont need that. So problem on usage side, not on provider one.
Solution for laminas-code would be just to drop support of that feature of PHP, which is not the best, I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There might be the another problem in laminas-code, since nullable flag are dropped in these promoted properties. But thats another issue. For doublers there should not be constructor property declarations anyways: they are already declared in base class.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've created another issue for this (separate!) problem: laminas/laminas-code#183