Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove aeolus from mychem #160

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

andrewsu
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewsu andrewsu commented Nov 5, 2024

per @mbrush :

One of the main ideas behind Gwenlyn's work on incorporating faers data into the approvals kp was that it provides a more current and rigorous representation of the data underlying aeolus - supporting more accurate/confident treats predictions

per @mbrush :
> One of the main ideas behind Gwenlyn's work on incorporating faers data into the approvals kp was that it provides a more current and rigorous representation of the data underlying aeolus - supporting more accurate/confident treats predictions
@andrewsu andrewsu requested a review from colleenXu November 5, 2024 18:44
@colleenXu colleenXu closed this Dec 17, 2024
@colleenXu colleenXu deleted the remove-aeolus-from-mychem branch December 17, 2024 00:31
@colleenXu colleenXu restored the remove-aeolus-from-mychem branch December 17, 2024 00:38
@colleenXu colleenXu reopened this Dec 17, 2024
@colleenXu
Copy link
Collaborator

I've added a complete removal of MyChem's aeolusTreats operations to the remove-clinical-trials branch a293800

This change is live within 10 min for all instances of BTE, since all are using that branch's MyChem yaml right now (override).

I think the decision on keeping this removal (aka merging to master) can be bundled with the decision on removing the clinical-trials-data operations. AKA they can be discussed and decided together in #157.

So I'm going to close this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants