Add gapfilled reactions to model on integrate

[nconrad]

Sorry I forgot this ticket.

From @cshenry...
It has a few ramifications:
1.) To avoid race conditions, I only want to allow one gapfilling operation to run at a time. To enforce this, we'll need some sort of "locking" mechanism (which is always a pain, but necessary).
2.) Integration and unintegration of gapfillings will be much slower than they are now...
3.) "list_models" and "get_model" will be much much faster... and more reliable.

[chian]

Sounds fair enough. In the future, it seems like a gapfill should run on a
'version' of the model that was input (rather than modify the model object
directly) and that two parallel gapfills should spin off parallel versions
that could then be merged later. Something for the future projects list.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:59 AM, nconrad [email protected] wrote:

Sorry I forgot this ticket.

From @cshenry https://github.com/cshenry...
It has a few ramifications:
1.) To avoid race conditions, I only want to allow one gapfilling
operation to run at a time. To enforce this, we'll need some sort of
"locking" mechanism (which is always a pain, but necessary).
2.) Integration and unintegration of gapfillings will be much slower than
they are now...
3.) "list_models" and "get_model" will be much much faster... and more
reliable.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#91.