-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 509
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable explicit ECC curve parameters export #368
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Enable explicit ECC curve parameters export #368
Conversation
Thanks a lot for this contribution, which also include tests! However, I wonder if this change has any practical use case: explicitly specifying curve parameters was a thing in the past, when people used generic Short Weierstrass implementations for curve arithmetic. Today curves are all named, and the implementation very specialized, because of special moduli for instance. On top of that, RFC5480 itself states that explicit curve parameters ( |
Personnally I used this thing in my work on CVE-2020-0601 the ChainOfFools vulnerability. I agree this is a thing of the past but it is still used by OpenSSL on Windows 10. For a research point of view it would be convenient to have such feature. |
OK, I was guessing right this was not a timely coincidence. |
Yes I think it is the correct way to handle it. It would avoid misuse of the library. |
Is it what you were thinking about ? |
Any news on this one ? |
Any plan to integrate it ? |
Explicit ECC curve parameters as defined in RFC5480 like -param_enc explicit parameter in openssl.