Add more Cnt rules #256
Add more Cnt rules #256
Conversation
dnltz
requested review from
KrzysztofHerman and
sergeiandreyev
as code owners
|
@akrinke I figured out Cnt.g1 generates no violation. Can you take a look why it doesn't? |
Add three new DRC rules for Cont. Cnt.g1 currently doesn't work! Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <[email protected]>
Add test GDS file with violations to verify DRCs are actually working. This GDS file contains wrong Cont placements to trigger Cnt. rules. Additionally, add pytest tests to run klayout and verify the result. Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <[email protected]>
Add Tox as infrastructure to run various Python checks. For now, add pytest to run all DRC verification tests. Signed-off-by: Daniel Schultz <[email protected]>
dnltz
force-pushed
the
WIP/dnltz/cnt-rules
branch
from
6f2d296 to
b93ac74
Compare
|
@dnltz this |
|
Hi @dnltz, thank you for contribution! |
|
We have implemented new DRC rules in PR #259, including |
|
@sergeiandreyev ah, perfect they already exists. Thanks for pointing them out. @akrinke Yes I can do that :) |
More Cnt rules and a test GDS file to trigger violations. The file only contains Cont violations but can be extended in the future!
layout is drawn after the layout rules with each rule violating the requirements.