Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM: Refactor core code list ontology URIs to adhere to linked data best practices #268

Open
NiclasScheiber opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@NiclasScheiber
Copy link
Contributor

NiclasScheiber commented Sep 16, 2024

With the new recommended URI structure for code lists to enable querying ( #256 ), the fragments after the # of the URIs in the core code lists are too long.

Structure:
@id: {{baseURL}}/{{codeListName}}#{{code}}

UNCEFACT (Example):
@id: https://vocabulary.uncefact.org/UnitMeasureCode#10

CoreCodeLists (Unpractical):
https://onerecord.iata.org/ns/coreCodeLists#RadioactiveMaterialClassification_SPECIAL_FORM

To mitigate, and to not put current implementations in trouble, I suggest to deprecate the whole coreCodeLists ontology and re-publish existing and publish all new code lists in a new Ontology, e.g. https://onerecord.iata.org/ns/code-lists

Code-Lists (New):
https://onerecord.iata.org/ns/code-lists/RadioactiveMaterialClassification#SPECIAL_FORM

@aloccid-iata
Copy link
Collaborator

I am fine with the renaming but we need to have full approval

@lambertciata
Copy link
Collaborator

See: #268

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants