-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cache bottle attestations #18581
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Cache bottle attestations #18581
Conversation
This will help limit the number of times we need to query GitHub for the attestation in CI.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense to me! Does make me wonder whether this caching could/should be in Homebrew/brew, though?
That's where we're making this change! |
I cannot read today 🙈 apologies! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirmed this still looks good now I know what repository I'm in today 🙃
|
||
sig { params(pathname: Pathname, scrub: T::Boolean).returns(T::Boolean) } | ||
def stale_attestation?(pathname, scrub) | ||
scrub || prune?(pathname, ATTESTATION_CLEANUP_DAYS) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might be nice if this could be cleaned up based on the state of the cached bottles? Not a blocker, very much nice-to-have.
Co-authored-by: Carlo Cabrera <[email protected]>
|
||
if cached_attestation.exist? | ||
begin | ||
return JSON.parse(cached_attestation.read) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to make sure I understand: the intended behavior here is to treat a cached attestation as implicitly previously verified, right?
I think we could go two ways with this: either assume cached == verified
(which in turn means an attacker who can modify the cache/insert a dummy cache member can bypass verification, although such an attacker is already pretty powerful), or perform verification again on the cached attestation (so skip the download, but do the rest of the gh attestation verify
).
The first seems fine to me, but the second is perhaps preferable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The first seems fine to me, but the second is perhaps preferable.
Agreed 👍🏻
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
brew style
with your changes locally?brew typecheck
with your changes locally?brew tests
with your changes locally?This will help limit the number of times we need to query GitHub for the
attestation in CI.