Implement image heap suballocation #1984
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Until now, we would never attempt to suballocate small image heaps.
Some games, at least Nixxes ports, tend to create lots of smaller heaps.
The intent seems to be that the game can use fine-grained residency
priority. On implementations without EXT_pageable (e.g. RADV currently),
we assume a naive allocation model that cannot take advantage of
priorities, so there is no need to consider priority set by
applications. In future, should RADV get support for this EXT,
we may want to revisit these assumptions.
To make image suballocation work better, normalize heap type in allocations.
Fixes a potential problem where two different CUSTOM heaps
can end up allocating from each other. Normalize the CUSTOM heap type
to a standard type and compare those.
Ensure that all suballocated heaps have a GLOBAL buffer, but just
change the explicit usage. This way we don't have to check the heap
flags and RTV heaps and resource heaps can share chunks as long as
their memory types match.