Skip to content

Issues: HPQC-LABS/Book_About_Quadratization

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

32 Open 3 Closed
32 Open 3 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

KKR not working
#49 opened Mar 2, 2021 by ndattani
@RubyK777 @tl355
Tasks for Matthew Charbonneau
#47 opened Jan 8, 2021 by ndattani
10 of 12 tasks
Tasks for Ruby
#46 opened Jan 8, 2021 by ndattani
3 tasks done
@RubyK777
BCR methods should have coefficients represented in terms of k not in terms of m. Because it's misleading to think that these coefficients are exponential when they are just an exponential of a logarithm!
#45 opened Oct 18, 2019 by ndattani
List of things to do
#44 opened Sep 21, 2019 by ndattani
22 tasks
Typos
#43 opened Sep 19, 2019 by ndattani
1 task
Proposition 3.14 of Gruber's thesis seems to be an alternative RBS (it's Rosenberg-like but not the same)
#41 opened Sep 8, 2019 by ndattani
More papers
#38 opened Aug 14, 2019 by ndattani
14 tasks
Correct Catherine's affiliation to what it actually was when she helped (when she was full-time at a university and a "consultant" for D-Wave)
#37 opened Aug 14, 2019 by ndattani
Bit-flipping, not only is the result submodular, but the range of coefficients of quadratic terms is much smaller
#36 opened Aug 11, 2019 by ndattani
@ndattani
Add to "Further References"
#35 opened Apr 1, 2019 by ndattani
"Efficient optimization of perturbative gadgets" by Cao and Kais can be added to the "Further References" page at the end of the book
#34 opened Mar 27, 2019 by ndattani
@yudongcao
Bottom two leaves of Fig. 1 in Split-reduc paper are wrong (thanks to Andreas Soteriou for pointing this out)
#33 opened Mar 27, 2019 by ndattani
1
First page we are just changing -N(b1b2b3) to N(b1 - b1b2 -b1b3). what quadratization is that?
#32 opened Mar 27, 2019 by ndattani
Add examples for all SFR gadgets
#31 opened Feb 16, 2019 by ndattani
@agu1729
2
Clean up connections between: Strandmark, GBP and ABCG
#30 opened Feb 12, 2019 by erodriguezheck
2 tasks
@erodriguezheck
NTR-GBP there's a -b1 and +b1
#27 opened Jan 26, 2019 by ndattani
4-local with no auxiliaries:https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.07683.pdf
#26 opened Jan 21, 2019 by ndattani
1
See Nick's email "Checks of papers"
#25 opened Jan 20, 2019 by ndattani
CZW can actually go in SFR section, and special case can go in PTR section. Also add the "pro" that it reproduces the full spectrum AND degeneracies.
#24 opened Jan 20, 2019 by ndattani
1
Perhaps change PTR to GTR (general term reduction) or ATR (any term reduction).
#23 opened Jan 20, 2019 by ndattani
ABCG Reduction (pairwise covers)
#22 opened Jan 16, 2019 by ndattani
MATLAB code to verify 9 of the Part III gadgets ( NP-SJ by both people, 4 other methods per person)
#21 opened Jan 16, 2019 by ndattani
@NebulaicAcid @danielheathcote
Derivation of SFR-BCR-4 coefficients in Mathematica
#20 opened Jan 16, 2019 by ndattani
@armankarshenas
Things to fix from PDF in Elisabeth's first email to Nike
#19 opened Jan 13, 2019 by ndattani
8 tasks
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.