Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding Gensim last update for support 3.12 #225

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tavallaie
Copy link

@tavallaie tavallaie commented May 26, 2024

Adding the last stable commit of gensim for support Python 3.12, I wrote a similar problem here.
https://blog.techbend.io/overcoming-the-hazm-compatibility-challenge-with-python-312

This PR fixes issue #220

adding last stable commit of gensim for support python 3.12
I wrote similar problem here.
https://blog.techbend.io/overcoming-the-hazm-compatibility-challenge-with-python-312
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for you interest in improving Deepparse.

@davebulaval
Copy link
Collaborator

Does it work with the develop branch instead of a specific commit?

@tavallaie
Copy link
Author

tavallaie commented May 31, 2024

Because I don't know which commit will be added next, and it may break deepparse, I stick to the specific commit I know works.

@davebulaval davebulaval changed the title adding gensim last update for support 3.12 Adding Gensim last update for support 3.12 Jun 1, 2024
@davebulaval
Copy link
Collaborator

Gensim expects a release in two to three weeks ref. Therefore, I prefer to wait for the official release for a more robust approach. In the meantime, one can use a previous version of Gensim.

@davebulaval davebulaval closed this Jun 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants