Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make clear that root password prompt is coming from sudo, not mkcert #578

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

davebarkerxyz
Copy link

Given the sensitive nature of passwords of users with sudo privileges, I propose to preserve the default behaviour (and prompt) of sudo as the user may expect, and instead print an explanatory message stating that mkcert is re-running with sudo.

Issue #178 led to commit aa4dd61 which added the --prompt Sudo password: argument to the sudo command when re-running with elevated permissions. While a reasonable solution to the potential "which password is required?" confusion users may face, for users unfamiliar with the --prompt argument to sudo, it can cause concern that the user's password is being captured and processed by mkcert itself, and not by sudo (an insecure and unfortunately not uncommon action taken by some applications, like Zoom - see https://www.vmray.com/cyber-security-blog/zoom-macos-installer-analysis-good-apps-behaving-badly/).

This PR seeks to make it clearer to users that the password prompt is coming from sudo and not mkcert, while still explaining to users which password is being requested.

(When first trying mkcert -install and seeing the "Sudo password:" prompt, I worried that it would be capturing and saving my password for future elevation, and had to read the source to find out what was really happening - users less familiar with Go may have struggled with this).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants