Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update hyperelasticity docs to show how to use NonlinearSolve #910
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
update hyperelasticity docs to show how to use NonlinearSolve #910
Changes from 1 commit
522480c
0803edc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the reason for passing
ΓN
etc throughp
instead of just directly using them from the scope above (since this is a closure closing over it)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to be sure that I totally understand this correctly, in NonlinearSolve.jl there is currently no support to evaluate both at the same time, right? If so, then we can separate the functions above into jacobian and residual only:
+- typos and we can do the same with with
assemble_global!
I will benchmark this after I finish the prioritized tasks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't it be better to keep them in the same function with a flag to chose what to evaluate. That would make it easier to evaluate both for solvers that support it, to share some computations?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure about the performance hit associated with splitting up the Jacobian and residual computation, especially for element formulations which come with some kind of condensation for the Jacobian.