Skip to content

Let AI and cloud vendors know what they can pay Andrew to review their products

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

ExamProCo/review-request-page

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

7 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

review-request-page

Let AI and cloud vendors know what they can pay Andrew to review their products

Lovable's GTP Engineer Prompting Tips

  • You have to fine the copy yourself, focus on structure

Lovable's GPT Engineer Feedback

  • It is not obvious that the projects you work on, are ALL public. (Make it clear, I am working in public, and everyone can see my project)
  • I wish I could one press and have screenshots of the outputed website for documentation history
  • I want to instead update golden technical doc and dump it in instead of tweaking the page through multi-convo because I want to capture all documentation for my technical doc. I want my prompting to be derminstic (replicable via steps)
  • I want to review the code before I sync to my repo (otherwise I can't provide it feedback until it synced)
  • I don't know if it it publishes the changes to the repo after each change.
  • If it did, it would be nice if it was via a PR so I can review
  • I don't know my usage when I'm using the app. I wish this was clear.
  • Easy way to export chat history to audit the effectiveness with humans.
  • How would I evaluate other than human review that the website/web-app I wanted met my technical and business use case.
  • I wish I could have my technical doc updated.
  • I want to hook up the code to existing repo
  • I understand not offering the code preview in free, but in paid I would want code preview before syncing.
  • When syncing I'd like tell put someone other than the root project eg. app
  • The other reason I dont want to tweak by talking and I'd rather constantly dump my golden tech doc is because I know that as the context window grows summarzation happens and the results can get worst.

Prompt Engingeer History

Spec 1

Results

  • How close: 90% (before required changes)
    • see required changes below
  • How close 97% (after required changes)
    • pagination doesn't show up (maybe only if there is pagination)
    • copy is still not improve for packages

HomePage Changes Required:

  • Need to include pagination in video list for a limit of 50
  • Request Review button should not be in the Meet Your Review card, it suppose to be its own call to action
  • Watch button missing from video list
  • Video list is not supposed to use a popup for videos thats only for meet your reviewer

RequestReview Changes Required:

  • Plans should not have a button for each. We are suppose to have a Request Review Now Component because all plan buttons would go to the same form
  • The bullets for the plans are fine but the summarization copy is wrong

Follow Up Review

  • Figure out Evaluations or test suite for outputted results
  • How to structure technical doc into prompting chunks to get more accurate results.
    • Prompt Chunking (When your prompt is too large, that you need to break it down into step by step actions)

About

Let AI and cloud vendors know what they can pay Andrew to review their products

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published