In this study, we set out to assess how effectively machine learning models can identify phishing attempts, a significant and evolving threat in today's digital world. We focused on two well-established models: the Random Forest Classifier (RFC) and the Support Vector Machine (SVM)6. Each model was rigorously tested using Python in a Jupyter Notebook environment reflect the complex nature of real-world phishing attacks. Our results clearly show that the SVM model was particularly effective, achieving an impressive accuracy rate of 97.53%. This demonstrates its strong capability to accurately detect phishing attempts and highlights its value as a reliable tool in cybersecurity defenses. The RFC also performed well, proving its worth in situations where ease of interpretation and computational efficiency are important.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
comparative Analysis of Phishing Detection RFC vs SVM
EsraArq/Phishing_Detection
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Folders and files
Name | Name | Last commit message | Last commit date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Repository files navigation
About
comparative Analysis of Phishing Detection RFC vs SVM
Topics
Resources
Stars
Watchers
Forks
Releases
No releases published
Packages 0
No packages published