-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Add updated performance report (#255)
- adds a new performance report, since the latest one predates important performance enhancing changes in the code. - fixes a launch file missing the argument to change the configuration yaml. - adds the possiblity to measure the processing latency for beluga_amcl. Signed-off-by: Gerardo Puga <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
Showing
13 changed files
with
581 additions
and
23 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ | ||
# Performance comparison between beluga_amcl and nav2_amcl | ||
|
||
## Environment details | ||
|
||
- CPU: **Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9900 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 16 cores** | ||
- CPU Caches: L1 Data 32 KiB (x8), L1 Instruction 32 KiB (x8), L2 Unified 256 KiB (x8), L3 Unified 16384 KiB (x1) | ||
- RAM: 16384 MB | ||
- Host OS: Ubuntu 22.04.6 LTS | ||
- ROS 2 version: **Humble Hawksbill** | ||
- AMCL version: `ros-humble-nav2-amcl` package, version 1.1.9-1jammy.20230807.174459 | ||
|
||
## Experimental setup | ||
|
||
The following configuration was used during the experiments: | ||
|
||
- The benchmarks were run using 250, 300, 400, 500, 750, 1000, 2000, 5000, 10000, 20000, 50000, 100000 and 200000 particles. | ||
- `beluga_amcl` was run both using multi-threaded (`par`) and single-threaded (`seq`) configurations. `nav2_amcl` only provides single-threaded execution. | ||
- Both the `beam sensor` and the `likelihood field` sensor model were tested. | ||
- The bagfile containing the synthetic dataset was replayed at 1x speed (real time). | ||
|
||
More specific configuration details can be found in the `yaml` files in the `baseline_configurations/` folder: | ||
|
||
- `nav2_amcl` (likelihood field) uses [likelihood_params.yaml](likelihood_params.yaml) | ||
- `beluga_amcl` (likelihood field, single-threaded) uses [likelihood_params.yaml](likelihood_params.yaml) | ||
- `beluga_amcl` (likelihood field, multi-threaded) uses [likelihood_params_par.yaml](likelihood_params_par.yaml) | ||
- `nav2_amcl` (beam) uses [beam_params.yaml](beam_params.yaml) | ||
- `beluga_amcl` (beam, single-threaded) uses [beam_params.yaml](beam_params.yaml) | ||
- `beluga_amcl` (beam, multi-threaded) uses [beam_params_par.yaml](beam_params_par.yaml) | ||
|
||
Except for the multithreading and sensor model parameters, the configuration on all of the files is identical. | ||
|
||
## Recorded metrics | ||
|
||
The following metrics were recorded during each run: | ||
|
||
- RSS (Resident Set Size), amount of memory alloated to the process. Measured in megabytes. | ||
- CPU usage. Measured in percentage of the total CPU usage. | ||
- rms APE (root-mean-squared Absolute Pose Error) statistics. In meters. | ||
- Processing latency (time interval between laser-scan reception and pose estimation). Measured in milliseconds. | ||
|
||
The processing latency was only recorded for `beluga_amcl`. The unmodified `nav2_amcl` binary does not provide this metric in the process output. | ||
|
||
## Results | ||
|
||
#### Beluga vs. Nav2 AMCL using Likelihood Field sensor model | ||
|
||
In the following plot the results of the benchmark are shown for all three of the tested alternatives. The vertical scale is logarithmic to better show the differences between the configurations throughout the whole range of particle counts. | ||
|
||
![Beluga Seq vs Beluga Par vs. Nav2 AMCL with Likelihood Field Sensor Model](likelihood_beluga_vs_beluga_vs_amcl.png) | ||
|
||
Comments on the results: | ||
|
||
- The memory usage of `beluga_amcl` (single and multi-threaded) is significantly lower than that of `nav2_amcl`. | ||
- Both `beluga_amcl` configurations have a lower CPU load than `nav2_amcl` when using the `likelihood` sensor model. The multi-threaded configuration of `beluga_amcl` causes more CPU load than the single-threaded one due to the additional synchronization overhead. | ||
- Above $50k$ particles `nav2_amcl` single-threaded process begins to saturate the CPU and its APE metrics begin to deteriorate, while `beluga_amcl` in both configurations remains stable thanks to its lower CPU load. For particle counts below $50k$ the APE metrics of all three alternatives are similar. | ||
- The multi-threaded configuration of `beluga_amcl` has lower latency than the single-threaded one, at the expense of additional CPU load. The latency of `nav2_amcl` was not measured for the reasons explained above. | ||
|
||
#### Beluga vs. Nav2 AMCL using Beam sensor model | ||
|
||
In the following plot the results of the benchmark are shown for all three of the tested configurations when using the Beam Sensor model. The vertical scale is logarithmic to better show the differences between the configurations throughout the whole range of particle counts. | ||
|
||
![Beluga Seq vs Beluga Par vs. Nav2 AMCL with Beam Sensor Model](beam_beluga_vs_beluga_vs_amcl.png) | ||
|
||
Comments on the results: | ||
|
||
- `beluga_amcl` in both multi-threaded and single-threaded configurations uses significantly less memory than `nav2_amcl`. | ||
- Both the single-threaded configuration of `beluga_amcl` and `nav2_amcl` have similar CPU load performance when using the `beam` sensor model. The multi-threaded configuration of `beluga_amcl` uses more CPU than the single-threaded one due to the additional synchronization overhead. | ||
- Above $50k$ particles both `nav2_amcl` and the single-threaded configuration of `beluga_amcl` begin to saturate the CPU and their APE metrics begin to deteriorate, while `beluga_amcl` in multi-threaded configuration remains stable. For particle counts below $50k$ the APE metrics of all three alternatives are similar. | ||
- The multi-threaded configuration of `beluga_amcl` has lower latency than the single-threaded one, at the expense of additional CPU load. The latency of `nav2_amcl` was not measured for the reasons explained above. | ||
|
||
## Conclusions | ||
|
||
- `beluga_amcl`'s memory usage is significantly lower than that of `nav2_amcl` in all configurations. | ||
- The single-threaded configuration of `beluga_amcl` performs at a lower or equal CPU load than that of `nav2_amcl`. When configured to use the `likelihood` sensor model the performance of the single-threaded `beluga_amcl` configuration is significantly better than that of `nav2_amcl`. | ||
- The multi-threaded configuration of `beluga_amcl` always uses more CPU than the single-threaded configuration. | ||
- `beluga_amcl`'s APE performance is similar to that of `nav2_amcl` for lower particle counts. For higher particle counts the performance begins to deteriorate when the processes saturate the available CPU resources. | ||
- The multi-threaded configuration of `beluga_amcl` has lower latency than the single-threaded one, at the expense of additional CPU load. Also, Thanks to the reduced latency and higher CPU saturation ceiling the localization solution using `beluga_amcl` in multi-threaded configuration remains stable for higher particle counts. | ||
|
||
## How to reproduce | ||
|
||
To replicate the benchmarks, after building and sourcing the workspace, run the following commands from the current directory: | ||
|
||
```bash | ||
mkdir beam_beluga_seq | ||
cd beam_beluga_seq | ||
ros2 run beluga_benchmark parameterized_run --initial-pose-y 2.0 250 300 400 500 750 1000 2000 5000 10000 20000 50000 100000 200000 --params-file $(pwd)/../../baseline_configurations/beam_params.yaml | ||
cd - | ||
mkdir beam_beluga_par | ||
cd beam_beluga_par | ||
ros2 run beluga_benchmark parameterized_run --initial-pose-y 2.0 250 300 400 500 750 1000 2000 5000 10000 20000 50000 100000 200000 --params-file $(pwd)/../../baseline_configurations/beam_params_par.yaml | ||
cd - | ||
mkdir beam_nav2_amcl | ||
cd beam_nav2_amcl | ||
ros2 run beluga_benchmark parameterized_run --initial-pose-y 2.0 250 300 400 500 750 1000 2000 5000 10000 20000 50000 100000 200000 --params-file $(pwd)/../../baseline_configurations/beam_params.yaml --package nav2_amcl --executable amcl | ||
cd - | ||
mkdir likelihood_beluga_seq | ||
cd likelihood_beluga_seq | ||
ros2 run beluga_benchmark parameterized_run --initial-pose-y 2.0 250 300 400 500 750 1000 2000 5000 10000 20000 50000 100000 200000 --params-file $(pwd)/../../baseline_configurations/likelihood_params.yaml | ||
cd - | ||
mkdir likelihood_beluga_par | ||
cd likelihood_beluga_par | ||
ros2 run beluga_benchmark parameterized_run --initial-pose-y 2.0 250 300 400 500 750 1000 2000 5000 10000 20000 50000 100000 200000 --params-file $(pwd)/../../baseline_configurations/likelihood_params_par.yaml | ||
cd - | ||
mkdir likelihood_nav2_amcl | ||
cd likelihood_nav2_amcl | ||
ros2 run beluga_benchmark parameterized_run --initial-pose-y 2.0 250 300 400 500 750 1000 2000 5000 10000 20000 50000 100000 200000 --params-file $(pwd)/../../baseline_configurations/likelihood_params.yaml --package nav2_amcl --executable amcl | ||
cd - | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Once the data has been acquired, it can be visualized using the following commands: | ||
|
||
```bash | ||
ros2 run beluga_benchmark compare_results \ | ||
-s beam_beluga_seq -l beam_beluga_seq \ | ||
-s beam_beluga_par -l beam_beluga_par \ | ||
-s beam_nav2_amcl -l beam_nav2_amcl --use-ylog | ||
|
||
ros2 run beluga_benchmark compare_results \ | ||
-s likelihood_beluga_seq -l likelihood_beluga_seq \ | ||
-s likelihood_beluga_par -l likelihood_beluga_par \ | ||
-s likelihood_nav2_amcl -l likelihood_nav2_amcl --use-ylog | ||
``` |
Binary file added
BIN
+183 KB
beluga_benchmark/docs/reports/2023-09-02/beam_beluga_vs_beluga_vs_amcl.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Binary file added
BIN
+137 KB
beluga_benchmark/docs/reports/2023-09-02/beam_beluga_vs_beluga_vs_amcl_linear.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Binary file added
BIN
+185 KB
beluga_benchmark/docs/reports/2023-09-02/likelihood_beluga_vs_beluga_vs_amcl.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Binary file added
BIN
+145 KB
...enchmark/docs/reports/2023-09-02/likelihood_beluga_vs_beluga_vs_amcl_linear.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
93 changes: 93 additions & 0 deletions
93
beluga_benchmark/docs/reports/baseline_configurations/beam_params.yaml
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ | ||
amcl: | ||
ros__parameters: | ||
# Odometry motion model type. | ||
robot_model_type: nav2_amcl::DifferentialMotionModel | ||
# Expected process noise in odometry’s rotation estimate from rotation. | ||
alpha1: 0.1 | ||
# Expected process noise in odometry’s rotation estimate from translation. | ||
alpha2: 0.05 | ||
# Expected process noise in odometry’s translation estimate from translation. | ||
alpha3: 0.1 | ||
# Expected process noise in odometry’s translation estimate from rotation. | ||
alpha4: 0.05 | ||
# Expected process noise in odometry's strafe estimate from translation. | ||
alpha5: 0.1 | ||
# The name of the coordinate frame published by the localization system. | ||
global_frame_id: map | ||
# The name of the coordinate frame published by the odometry system. | ||
odom_frame_id: odom | ||
# The name of the coordinate frame of the robot base. | ||
base_frame_id: base | ||
# The name of the topic where the map is published by the map server. | ||
map_topic: map | ||
# The name of the topic where scans are being published. | ||
scan_topic: scan | ||
# The name of the topic where an initial pose can be published. | ||
# The particle filter will be reset using the provided pose with covariance. | ||
initial_pose_topic: initialpose | ||
# Maximum number of particles that will be used. | ||
max_particles: 2000 | ||
# Minimum number of particles that will be used. | ||
min_particles: 500 | ||
# Error allowed by KLD criteria. | ||
pf_err: 0.05 | ||
# KLD criteria parameter. | ||
# Upper standard normal quantile for the probability that the error in the | ||
# estimated distribution is less than pf_err. | ||
pf_z: 3.0 | ||
# Fast exponential filter constant, used to filter the average particles weights. | ||
# Random particles are added if the fast filter result is larger than the slow filter result | ||
# allowing the particle filter to recover from a bad approximation. | ||
recovery_alpha_fast: 0. | ||
# Slow exponential filter constant, used to filter the average particles weights. | ||
# Random particles are added if the fast filter result is larger than the slow filter result | ||
# allowing the particle filter to recover from a bad approximation. | ||
recovery_alpha_slow: 0. | ||
# Resample will happen after the amount of updates specified here happen. | ||
resample_interval: 1 | ||
# Minimum angle difference from last resample for resampling to happen again. | ||
update_min_a: 0.2 | ||
# Maximum angle difference from last resample for resampling to happen again. | ||
update_min_d: 0.25 | ||
# Laser sensor model type. | ||
laser_model_type: beam | ||
# Maximum distance of an obstacle (if the distance is higher, this one will be used in the likelihood map). | ||
laser_likelihood_max_dist: 2.0 | ||
# Maximum range of the laser. | ||
laser_max_range: 100.0 | ||
# Maximum number of beams to use in the likelihood field sensor model. | ||
max_beams: 100 | ||
# Weight used to combine the probability of hitting an obstacle. | ||
z_hit: 0.5 | ||
# Weight used to combine the probability of random noise in perception. | ||
z_rand: 0.5 | ||
# Standard deviation of a gaussian centered arounds obstacles. | ||
sigma_hit: 0.2 | ||
# Whether to broadcast map to odom transform or not. | ||
tf_broadcast: true | ||
# Transform tolerance allowed. | ||
transform_tolerance: 1.0 | ||
# Execution policy used to apply the motion update and importance weight steps. | ||
# Valid options: "seq", "par". | ||
execution_policy: seq | ||
# Whether to set initial pose based on parameters. | ||
# When enabled, particles will be initialized with the specified pose coordinates and covariance. | ||
set_initial_pose: false | ||
# Initial pose x coordinate. | ||
initial_pose.x: 0.0 | ||
# Initial pose y coordinate. | ||
initial_pose.y: 0.0 | ||
# Initial pose yaw coordinate. | ||
initial_pose.yaw: 0.0 | ||
# Initial pose xx covariance. | ||
initial_pose.covariance_x: 0.25 | ||
# Initial pose yy covariance. | ||
initial_pose.covariance_y: 0.25 | ||
# Initial pose yawyaw covariance. | ||
initial_pose.covariance_yaw: 0.0685 | ||
# Initial pose xy covariance. | ||
initial_pose.covariance_xy: 0.0 | ||
# Initial pose xyaw covariance. | ||
initial_pose.covariance_xyaw: 0.0 | ||
# Initial pose yyaw covariance. | ||
initial_pose.covariance_yyaw: 0.0 |
Oops, something went wrong.