Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add enhanced implementations of construct() function, to allow bypass validation… #209

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arthurvd
Copy link
Member

Fixes #207. Not too happy yet about the fact that this is not built-in supported in Pydantic itself. Feels like a lot of custom code needed in our own BaseModel. Therefore, only a DRAFT PR, to hear your first ideas.

…ing validation of nested BaseModel input files.

I'm not too happy yet with how much custom code is required to bypass validation, but this is still in line with the recommendations typically found online.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow bypassing validation to read faulty input
1 participant