Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes on chunks sync successful out of range #1012

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

beastoin
Copy link
Collaborator

@beastoin beastoin commented Oct 9, 2024

Summary by Entelligence.AI

  • Bug Fix: Improved the logic in the Wals service to accurately update the status of Wals and notify subscribers. This fix enhances the reliability of status updates, providing users with more accurate and timely information about their Wals.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Image description Entelligence.AI

Walkthrough

The changeset primarily focuses on enhancing the loop logic in the wals.dart file. The update ensures accurate status updates for Wals and proper notification to subscribers. A new variable, wal, has been introduced to store the current Wal object, improving code readability and maintainability.

Changes

File Summary
app/lib/services/wals.dart Updated loop logic for correct status updates of Wals and subscriber notifications. Introduced a wal variable for storing the current Wal object, enhancing clarity.

"In the realm of code, where logic is king,
An update arrives, with improvements it brings.
No more confusion, no more stall,
Clear as crystal, stands the wal.
Subscribers rejoice, they're in the know,
As the status of Wals, correctly show.
So here's to progress, however small,
In the grand scheme of things, it benefits all." 🎉🚀


Uplevel your code reviews with Entelligence.AI Pro

Entelligence.AI Pro

If you like this project, please support us by purchasing the Pro version. The Pro version has advanced context, superior noise reduction and several proprietary improvements compared to the open source version. Moreover, Entelligence.AI Pro is free for open source projects.

@beastoin beastoin merged commit 3e53cf4 into main Oct 9, 2024
1 check passed
@beastoin beastoin deleted the jzecm_wal_local_sync_958 branch October 9, 2024 10:46
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Image description Entelligence.AI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f60719 and fe3e0ff commits.
Files selected (1)
  • app/lib/services/wals.dart (1)
Review comments generated (2)
  • Review: 2
  • LGTM: 0

Tips

Chat with Image description Entelligence.AI Bot (@Entelligence.AI)

  • Reply on review comments left by this bot to ask follow-up questions. A review comment is a comment on a diff or a file.
  • Invite the bot into a review comment chain by tagging @Entelligence.AI in a reply.

Code suggestions

  • The bot may make code suggestions, but please review them carefully before committing since the line number ranges may be misaligned.
  • You can edit the comment made by the bot and manually tweak the suggestion if it is slightly off.

Pausing incremental reviews

  • Add @Entelligence.AI: ignore anywhere in the PR description to pause further reviews from the bot.

Comment on lines +452 to +459
// Success? update status to synced
for (var j = i; j < i + steps && j < wals.length; j++) {
var wal = wals[j];
wals[j].status = WalStatus.synced; // ref to _wals[]

// Send
for (var sub in _subscriptions.values) {
sub.onWalSynced(_wals[j]);
sub.onWalSynced(wal);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Image description Entelligence.AI

The new loop logic seems to be correct, but it's not clear why the wal variable is introduced. It seems to be used only once in the onWalSynced method call. If there's no other use for this variable, it might be better to directly use wals[j] in the onWalSynced method call to avoid unnecessary variable assignment.

-         var wal = wals[j];
-         wals[j].status = WalStatus.synced; // ref to _wals[]
+         wals[j].status = WalStatus.synced;
  
          // Send
          for (var sub in _subscriptions.values) {
-           sub.onWalSynced(wal);
+           sub.onWalSynced(wals[j]);
          }

Comment on lines 457 to +459
// Send
for (var sub in _subscriptions.values) {
sub.onWalSynced(_wals[j]);
sub.onWalSynced(wal);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Image description Entelligence.AI

There is a potential issue with the way subscriptions are handled. If a subscription is removed during the iteration of _subscriptions.values, it could lead to a ConcurrentModificationError. Consider making a copy of the values before iterating over them.

-          for (var sub in _subscriptions.values) {
+          for (var sub in List.from(_subscriptions.values)) {
            sub.onWalSynced(wals[j]);
          }

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant