Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Zenodo metadata #139

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024
Merged

Add Zenodo metadata #139

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

rbeucher
Copy link
Member

I am adding some metadata for Zenodo on all the MED-related packages.
Please let me know if you are happy to be included or if you think I missed someone.
Also, you can change the order.

We don't have clear directives on who we should add or not. My views are

  • Main code contributors should go first
  • People who have participated indirectly in testing, and discussion during the development phase (@headmetal)
  • Maintainers
  • Other small contributors (bug fixes)

I tend to be quite open as I think the work environment often influences how we do things, but that is my personal opinion.

@aidanheerdegen, @anton-seaice can you please add your ORCID?

Thanks!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (f800051) 97.20% compared to head (3c5b7ef) 97.20%.
Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #139   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.20%   97.20%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines         573      573           
=======================================
  Hits          557      557           
  Misses         16       16           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dougiesquire
Copy link
Collaborator

We don't have clear directives on who we should add or not. My views are

  • Main code contributors should go first
  • People who have participated indirectly in testing, and discussion during the development phase (@headmetal)
  • Maintainers
  • Other small contributors (bug fixes)

I tend to be quite open as I think the work environment often influences how we do things, but that is my personal opinion.

Thanks @rbeucher. I agree. I've opened an issue in dev-docs because I think it is important to have guidelines documented. Please add your thoughts/opinions.

@anton-seaice
Copy link
Collaborator

@aidanheerdegen, @anton-seaice can you please add your ORCID?

Ok done

@dougiesquire dougiesquire merged commit a40adc9 into main Jan 29, 2024
15 checks passed
@dougiesquire dougiesquire deleted the zenodo branch January 29, 2024 22:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants