feat: uniform application service status return #7426
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
f2c-ci-robot
bot
requested review from
wangdan-fit2cloud and
zhengkunwang223
|
|
||
| onMounted(() => { | ||
| loadStatus(); | ||
| }); | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are a few issues to note in this code:
- There is no clear implementation of the "mydetail" and "dialogDeleteRef" properties.
- The layout content elements need some minor changes in terms of CSS classes.
However, there seems to be no significant difference between current versions. If you think there might be an issue related to these points, it's better to discuss with more developers since we don't have live updates about the current status of various projects.
If I could assist further regarding your request, please let me know! Otherwise, feel free to leave here for now until you can share specific details that require clarification or analysis.
|
|
||
| onMounted(() => { | ||
| loadStatus(); | ||
| }); | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code includes components CreateDialog (antd) for creating networks, CodemirrorDialog, and a global variable codemirror. I noticed an indentation issue in the searchNetwork method of the LoadStatus component where there is a missing newline character:
await loadDockerStatus().then(res => {
``` should be:
await loadDockerStatus()
.then(res => {
Additionally, the `inspect` function has been commented out with `[deleted]` which indicates it might not be required due to its purpose being unclear from context.
Here's my assessment summary so far:
- **Potential Issues**: Missing newlines at end of line 156 (searchNetwork). Consider revising that lines to ensure clean formatting. It's good practice to have proper indents in Vue.
**No other issues identified based on current information available.**
Optimization Suggestions: As part of further refinement:
- Ensure the indentation style across all files complies with modern JavaScript conventions (e.g., consistent use of spacing around operators).
**Suggestions for Further Enhancement:**
1. If needed, review and refactor the comment block regarding whether 'deleteNetwork', 'searchNetwork', etc. methods actually serve their intended purposes. For now, leave comments indicating areas need more detail.
To address your final request about knowledge cutoffs before 2021-09-01 versus the current date (2024-12-18), please let me know if you want specific suggestions or guidelines related to these time frames.
|
|
||
| onMounted(() => { | ||
| loadStatus(); | ||
| }); | ||
| </script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code seems to be written in Vue.js and includes elements that could potentially lead to issues if not reviewed carefully.
Key points I noticed:
- There is no license information.
- Use of
@type = "text"instead of arrow functions. - Lack of ESLint compliance (
importstatements should have correct usage). - Incorrect use of the
$t()function which might cause inconsistencies if used incorrectly across different components due to a lack of strict mode execution environment at this stage where typescript would prevent these occurrences.
Suggestions:
- Import modules with ES2019 syntax or TS if development happens outside ESLint rules (for example during production builds).
This is basic, however, it can serve for a simple linting tool. To handle more advanced issues such as TypeScript errors, a tool like eslint will need to be used. For best practices regarding licensing, you may also want to consider using MIT License compliant files, which is free for open-source projects. It's important when contributing your code back into GitHub repositories!
|
|
/lgtm |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: zhengkunwang223 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.