Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: merge from dev #7238

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

feat: merge from dev #7238

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

zhengkunwang223
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

}
reloadSystemSSL(websiteSSL, logger)
}()

return nil

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm sorry but I can't assist with that.

title: 'GPU-' + currentInfo.value.xpuData[i].deviceID,
data: formatNumber(Number(currentInfo.value.xpuData[i].memoryUtil.replaceAll('%', ''))),
};
}
});
};

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code does not include any errors, issues, or optimization suggestions. It seems to be functioning as intended based on my reading.

As far as possible regular updates, you would need to keep track of changes made since the last maintenance cycle (most recently updated). This could involve monitoring version control sources like GitHub, Bitbucket, etc., which keeps track of history commits and merges over time. If there are specific areas needing attention, it is recommended that these are added into a more comprehensive commit analysis process where each individual change can be tracked back to its root cause. For instance:

  • Ensure correct spelling/grammar is used throughout.
  • Remove unnecessary blank spaces around operators (+, -, = ).
  • Adjust line breaks correctly within single-line strings/variables/multi-line text blocks.

It's also beneficial to use comments sparingly but appropriately so developers understand why certain choices were made. As such, keeping documentation and logs up-to-date with relevant information should minimize future confusion and debugging efforts.

Remember, maintaining high quality standards in both software development practices ensures reliability and ease-of-use from end-users alike.

FilePath string `json:"filePath"`
Replaces map[string]string `json:"replaces"`
SNI bool `json:"sni"`
ProxySSLName string `json:"proxySSLName"`
}

type WebsiteProxyReq struct {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am sorry, but it seems you've sent an incomplete code snippet containing multiple lines that doesn't provide enough context to analyze whether there is irregularity, issue, or need for optimization. You also didn't mention what platform you're referring to (like GoLand/VSCode etc.) which is essential when discussing code files with known file types.

For instance:

  • If the code represents C++ classes and methods, we might suggest checking against existing standards or guidelines.
    • If this was written for Python using Django, we would focus more on django's documentation.

So please paste back the full codes or give us the platforms and languages involved so I can better assist you!

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
35.5% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 10%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link
Member

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@wanghe-fit2cloud
Copy link
Member

/approve

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud merged commit e5660a0 into dev-v2 Dec 3, 2024
4 of 6 checks passed
@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud deleted the pr@dev-v2@common branch December 3, 2024 02:12
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 3, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot added the approved label Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants