Update to Guzzle 5 #10

bakura10 · 2014-07-01T09:52:01Z

No description provided.

mohdsadiq1 · 2014-10-13T10:55:12Z

i am having following error while calling StripeClientTest('My_Api_Key');

Fatal error: Class 'PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase' not found in /var/www/survival/vendor/zfr/zfr-stripe/tests/ZfrStripeTest/Client/StripeClientTest.php on line 29

please let me know what i am doing wrong

bakura10 · 2014-10-13T11:08:59Z

Why are you using the test client ? You should use the Stripe Client (\ZfrStripe\Client\StripeClient)

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 13 oct. 2014 à 12:55, mohdsadiq1 [email protected] a écrit :

i am having following error while calling StripeClientTest('My_Api_Key');

Fatal error: Class 'PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase' not found in /var/www/survival/vendor/zfr/zfr-stripe/tests/ZfrStripeTest/Client/StripeClientTest.php on line 29

please let me know what i am doing wrong

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

mohdsadiq1 · 2014-10-13T13:33:57Z

as with the Stripe Client (\ZfrStripe\Client\StripeClient) i am not able the use the test credit cards and
i need to test all the param return by stripe so that i can update my
record on successful payment , i am very new to zf2 and stripe also

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Michaël Gallego [email protected]
wrote:

Why are you using the test client ? You should use the Stripe Client
(\ZfrStripe\Client\StripeClient)

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 13 oct. 2014 à 12:55, mohdsadiq1 [email protected] a écrit
:

i am having following error while calling
StripeClientTest('My_Api_Key');

Fatal error: Class 'PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase' not found in
/var/www/survival/vendor/zfr/zfr-stripe/tests/ZfrStripeTest/Client/StripeClientTest.php
on line 29

please let me know what i am doing wrong

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#10 (comment).

Regards:
MOHD SADIQ
8802720277

bakura10 · 2014-10-13T14:58:48Z

Testing an API is always hard. I think the simplest way is to simply "simulate" an API response by saving the response into an array.

I'm not sure to understand your problem actually :p

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 13 oct. 2014 à 15:33, mohdsadiq1 [email protected] a écrit :

i need to test all the param return by stripe so that i can update my
record on successful payment , i am very new to zf2 and stripe also

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Michaël Gallego [email protected]
wrote:

Why are you using the test client ? You should use the Stripe Client
(\ZfrStripe\Client\StripeClient)

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 13 oct. 2014 à 12:55, mohdsadiq1 [email protected] a écrit
:

i am having following error while calling
StripeClientTest('My_Api_Key');

Fatal error: Class 'PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase' not found in
/var/www/survival/vendor/zfr/zfr-stripe/tests/ZfrStripeTest/Client/StripeClientTest.php
on line 29

please let me know what i am doing wrong

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#10 (comment).

Regards:
MOHD SADIQ
8802720277
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Ocramius · 2014-10-13T15:03:24Z

He's using a test file in his own project, while that file shouldn't be used in first place except from zf-fr/zfr-stripe.

Ocramius · 2014-10-13T15:03:39Z

Update to Guzzle 4

Artax plox :P

bakura10 · 2014-10-13T15:04:28Z

Especially when Guzzle 5 was released today :( :too_much_major_versions:

Ocramius · 2014-10-13T15:06:12Z

bakura10 · 2014-10-13T15:07:02Z

Guzzle 4 was supposed to be "the major version for the next few years"

Ocramius · 2014-10-13T15:09:00Z

Major versions happen: 🎱 🎲

bakura10 · 2014-10-13T15:09:57Z

It's understandable for Guzzle (because of PSR-7... I hope the spec won't move now :/)

Ocramius · 2014-10-13T15:10:21Z

The spec isn't stable yet :-\

ukaner · 2015-02-05T22:51:26Z

I get this as well;

zfr/zfr-stripe v2.9.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.6.0, v3.7.0, v3.7.1, v3.7.2, v3.7.3, v3.7.4, v3.8.0, v3.8.1, v3.9.0].

bakura10 · 2015-02-06T14:16:37Z

hhmm this should work haha :p. I don't have any issue using ZfrStripe, can you please show me your full composer.json file ?

joshhornby · 2015-02-11T23:00:09Z

I am also getting the issue that @ukaner mentioned.

    "require": {
        "laravel/framework": "4.2.*",
        "dingo/api": "0.8.*",
        "lucadegasperi/oauth2-server-laravel": "3.*",
        "league/flysystem": "~1.0",
        "aws/aws-sdk-php": "~2.7",
        "league/flysystem-aws-s3-v2": "~1.0",
        "aws/aws-sdk-php-laravel": "~1.1",
        "league/commonmark": "0.6.*",
        "laravel/cashier": "2.0.*"
    },

zfr/zfr-stripe v2.12.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.6.0, v3.7.0, v3.7.1, v3.7.2, v3.7.3, v3.7.4, v3.8.0, v3.8.1, v3.9.0].

bakura10 · 2015-02-11T23:14:53Z

Grrr I don't understnad, it's working perfectly here. V3.9 should indeed match isn't it ? :(

bakura10 · 2015-02-11T23:16:20Z

Can you try forcing guzzle to 3.9 in your composer JSON? I'm wondering if another dependency of yours does not force a guzzle version prior 3.6 (if that's the case, you should ask those maintainers to allow newer versions)

joshhornby · 2015-02-11T23:19:51Z

Very odd, I have updated my composer like so:

"guzzle/guzzle": "3.9.*"

And I now get this

 Problem 1
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.0.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.0.1 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.0.2 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.0.3 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.0.4 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.1.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.10.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.10.1 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.10.2 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.11.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.11.1 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.12.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.2.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.2.1 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.2.2 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.2.3 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.2.4 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.3.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.3.1 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.3.2 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.3.3 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.3.4 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.3.5 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.3.6 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.4.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.5.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.6.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.7.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.8.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.8.1 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - zfr/zfr-stripe v2.9.0 requires guzzle/guzzle >=3.6,<=3.9 -> satisfiable by guzzle/guzzle[v3.9.0].
    - Conclusion: don't install guzzle/guzzle v3.9.0
    - Installation request for zfr/zfr-stripe 2.* -> satisfiable by zfr/zfr-stripe[v2.0.0, v2.0.1, v2.0.2, v2.0.3, v2.0.4, v2.1.0, v2.10.0, v2.10.1, v2.10.2, v2.11.0, v2.11.1, v2.12.0, v2.2.0, v2.2.1, v2.2.2, v2.2.3, v2.2.4, v2.3.0, v2.3.1, v2.3.2, v2.3.3, v2.3.4, v2.3.5, v2.3.6, v2.4.0, v2.5.0, v2.6.0, v2.7.0, v2.8.0, v2.8.1, v2.9.0].

bakura10 · 2015-02-12T07:02:42Z

Mehhhh... There is some black magic happening.

Can you try to remove zfr-stripe from your composer.josn and instead add "zfr/zfr-stripe-module": ~3.0 ?

This is exactly what I have in my application and it's working correctly. I honestly don't explain it myself. the strangest is that it does not report any conflicting libraries. Only that zfr stripe request 3.9, but cannot use 3.9 u_u

joshhornby · 2015-02-13T14:26:10Z

Same error again, one of these packages must be breaking it.

bakura10 · 2015-02-13T14:49:15Z

I had a look at all your direct dependencies, and none of them require Guzzle directly (except the AWS SDK but it requires Guzzle ~3.7, which should resolve). I'm going to push an update of ZfrStripe to have a simpler dependency to Guzzle (~3.6 instead of an explicit range). I did that in the past because Guzzle used to introduce BC even if minor versions, but as Guzzle 5 is out, I suspect they won't change it now.

bakura10 · 2015-02-13T14:52:09Z

I've just tagged v2.12.1, which requires guzzle ~3.6 instead of >=3.6,<=3.9.

Can you try again (just wait a few minutes so that Packagist correctly update everything)

joshhornby · 2015-02-13T14:59:36Z

Seems to be working now 👍

bakura10 · 2015-02-13T15:00:05Z

Yeah \o/. Thanks!

lunetics · 2016-02-22T23:49:19Z

what about guzzle6? 💃

bakura10 · 2016-02-23T08:48:15Z

Still waiting for Guzzle services to be available in v6 :). Guzzle commands have been updated to v6 but Guzzle services (which ZfrStripe relies on) not yet. You can see their branch here: https://github.com/guzzle/guzzle-services/tree/guzzle6

sisve · 2017-01-02T06:48:16Z

Huzzah! guzzle/guzzle-services@3bdd887

bakura10 · 2017-01-02T07:18:27Z

Not tagged yet isn't it ? But definitely seeems on good tracks :D

bakura10 · 2017-01-10T18:11:34Z

Oh sorry @sisve , I've didn't realized it was tagged.

Indeed, this means that this package could now be upgraded to Guzzle Services 1.0.0 which rely on Guzzle 6 :). unfortuantely at the moment I really don't have any availability as it's pretty long to upgrade it.

However if anyone would like to take the lead of that, I've already upgraded another package of mine that I need currently to this new version: https://github.com/zf-fr/zfr-shopify. That could serve as a reference for anyone wanting to tackle an upgrade.

The only small problem is that there are still some issues like this one (guzzle/guzzle-services#129) that make me think we should wait a bit :). But if anyone has time, please go on and submit a PR :).

Ocramius added the enhancement label Oct 13, 2014

bakura10 changed the title ~~Update to Guzzle 4~~ Update to Guzzle 5 Oct 13, 2014

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update to Guzzle 5 #10

Update to Guzzle 5 #10

bakura10 commented Jul 1, 2014

mohdsadiq1 commented Oct 13, 2014

bakura10 commented Oct 13, 2014

mohdsadiq1 commented Oct 13, 2014

bakura10 commented Oct 13, 2014

Ocramius commented Oct 13, 2014

Ocramius commented Oct 13, 2014

bakura10 commented Oct 13, 2014

Ocramius commented Oct 13, 2014

bakura10 commented Oct 13, 2014

Ocramius commented Oct 13, 2014

bakura10 commented Oct 13, 2014

Ocramius commented Oct 13, 2014

ukaner commented Feb 5, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 6, 2015

joshhornby commented Feb 11, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 11, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 11, 2015

joshhornby commented Feb 11, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 12, 2015

joshhornby commented Feb 13, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 13, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 13, 2015

joshhornby commented Feb 13, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 13, 2015

lunetics commented Feb 22, 2016

bakura10 commented Feb 23, 2016

sisve commented Jan 2, 2017

bakura10 commented Jan 2, 2017

bakura10 commented Jan 10, 2017

Update to Guzzle 5 #10

Update to Guzzle 5 #10

Comments

bakura10 commented Jul 1, 2014

mohdsadiq1 commented Oct 13, 2014

bakura10 commented Oct 13, 2014

mohdsadiq1 commented Oct 13, 2014

bakura10 commented Oct 13, 2014

Ocramius commented Oct 13, 2014

Ocramius commented Oct 13, 2014

bakura10 commented Oct 13, 2014

Ocramius commented Oct 13, 2014

bakura10 commented Oct 13, 2014

Ocramius commented Oct 13, 2014

bakura10 commented Oct 13, 2014

Ocramius commented Oct 13, 2014

ukaner commented Feb 5, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 6, 2015

joshhornby commented Feb 11, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 11, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 11, 2015

joshhornby commented Feb 11, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 12, 2015

joshhornby commented Feb 13, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 13, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 13, 2015

joshhornby commented Feb 13, 2015

bakura10 commented Feb 13, 2015

lunetics commented Feb 22, 2016

bakura10 commented Feb 23, 2016

sisve commented Jan 2, 2017

bakura10 commented Jan 2, 2017

bakura10 commented Jan 10, 2017