You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is not written in the textbook that there is a requirement to label the class of the returned object with the suggested label of “result:CommandResult”, neither does such representation (also reflected in AB3's User Guide and the textbook) affect the meaning of the sequence diagram. For these reasons, the bug is rejected with its severity downgraded to VeryLow.
Items for the Tester to Verify
❓ Issue response
Team chose [response.Rejected]
I disagree
Reason for disagreement: In this case, if you include result:CommandResult, it will be very clear to the developers that you are returning a CommandResult class. However, in this case, I am not sure where the result is coming from or what it is. This might create a lot of confusion.
❓ Issue severity
Team chose [severity.VeryLow]
Originally [severity.Low]
I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Result reference cannot be find anywhere else. can label :CommandResult with "result:CommandResult"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: