Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

STM #28

Open
akovari opened this issue Jan 25, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

STM #28

akovari opened this issue Jan 25, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees
@kurobako
Labels
stdlib Standard library feature

Comments

@akovari
Copy link
Member

akovari commented Jan 25, 2020

No description provided.

@akovari akovari added the stdlib Standard library feature label Jan 25, 2020
akovari added a commit that referenced this issue May 21, 2020
@akovari
#28 STM: enabling STM module
6c1e1b8
akovari added a commit that referenced this issue May 22, 2020
@akovari
#28 STM: testcase
ea2f977
akovari added a commit that referenced this issue May 22, 2020
@akovari
#28 STM: adding STM types
5d942e2
akovari added a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2020
@akovari
#28 STM - adding TruffleBoundaries to the builtin module
bc2c857
akovari added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 14, 2020
@akovari
#33 Context managers: initial impl
deb08bf 
#28 STM: attempt to make it work with async
akovari added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 14, 2020
@akovari
#33 Context managers: initial impl
bda3647 
#28 STM: attempt to make it work with async
akovari added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 15, 2020
@akovari
#28 STM: adding some debug logging
fef862b
akovari added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2020
@akovari
#28 STM: fixing async use with STM
371ca3c
akovari added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2020
@akovari
#28 STM: STM works with async code inside now
9c8ef4d
@akovari
Copy link
Member Author

akovari commented Jun 21, 2020

Now documented in https://yatta-lang.org/docs/stdlib/stm/

@akovari
Copy link
Member Author

akovari commented Sep 10, 2020

@kurobako you finished with the new impl or is there anything left to do here?

@kurobako
Copy link
Contributor

@akovari there is still main part missing (: Then the integration. I hope to get it done during the weekend but let's see.

@kurobako
Copy link
Contributor

@akovari I am also concerned how we handle Promises inside transactions the best way. Fool-proving it if possible...

@akovari
Copy link
Member Author

akovari commented Sep 11, 2020

Oh, ok, cool, thanks for the info

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@kurobako kurobako

Labels
stdlib Standard library feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@akovari @kurobako