Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tech uniques for AI decision weight should not have a star icon in the tech tree #12505

Closed
1 task done
adeverteuil opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
1 task done
Labels

Comments

@adeverteuil
Copy link

adeverteuil commented Nov 20, 2024

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Game Version

4.14.7

Describe the bug

I notice that there is a star icon on the tech tree to represent "uniques". However, there is often 1 more star than unique listed.

I found out there are some "AI deicision weight" modifiers that are hidden from the tech description text at the bottom, but still have a star representing them.

For example, Astronomy has these three uniques:

  • [+1] Movement <for [Embarked] units>
  • Enables [Embarked] units to enter ocean tiles
  • [+50]% weight to this choice for AI decisions

Source:

{
"name": "Astronomy",
"row": 2,
"uniques": ["[+1] Movement <for [Embarked] units>","Enables [Embarked] units to enter ocean tiles","[+50]% weight to this choice for AI decisions"],
"prerequisites": ["Compass","Education"],
"quote": "'Joyfully to the breeze royal Odysseus spread his sail, and with his rudder skillfully he steered.' - Homer"
},

The last one, [+50]% weight to this choice for AI decisions, should not have a star icon in the Tech box.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Open the tech tree.
  2. Compare the number of stars with the number of Uniques in the text description.

Screenshots

Screenshot_20241119_215325_Unciv

Link to save file

No response

Operating System

Android

Additional Information

I'm unsure if there are other types of uniques that ought not to have a star icon displayed.

@yairm210
Copy link
Owner

Good catch!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants