We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There exists a slower mersenne twister that computes 64 bits of random values instead of 32.
Maybe we should document this fact for users that are concerned with higher quality random numbers?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Seemingly related discussion: numpy/numpy#3137
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
There exists a slower mersenne twister that computes 64 bits of random values instead of 32.
Maybe we should document this fact for users that are concerned with higher quality random numbers?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: