Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lcov in llvm vs ptrace #1562

Open
xd009642 opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

lcov in llvm vs ptrace #1562

xd009642 opened this issue May 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@xd009642
Copy link
Owner

Because the llvm coverage instruments the binary we generally skip all the DWARF parsing etc and rely on llvm/rust knowing what they're doing and being more correct (DWARF is a mess). But this means for things like the lcov coverage reports the filenames get lost.

Instead it may be better to lean on the source analysis module and get nice demangled names of symbols etc in a file - maybe even going as far as getting the fully qualified name for the item (though this isn't super necessary as lcov uses the file name + symbol name so a human can disambiguate).

@xd009642 xd009642 self-assigned this May 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant