Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
I read it, didn't seem like there was anything to respond to? You didn't really ask any questions, just shared your opinion, and I didn't feel the need to try and change your mind |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
First of all, although everyone's understanding of Nuxt is not consistent, but one thing is very sure, that is, Nuxt is a front-end meta-framework with multiple features based on Vue language. And WXT is just a multi-language browser development framework based on the Vite packaging tool. This huge difference leads to some problems:
unplugin-auto-import
andunplugin-vue-components
. You can't ask someone to adapt it separately, so why not use a more mature and convenient solution in the Vite ecosystem and adapt it for plugins likeunplugin-auto-import
.@vitejs/plugin-vue
.So, there are some things about Nuxt that WXT can learn, such as convention-based file structures, but the two are not the same type of tool. Often it's not good to develop blindly, you have to figure out what's easy to develop and what's not. I'm very optimistic about WXT, but after trying it out I've decided to stick with CRXJS for now, even though CRXJS hasn't been updated in a while.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions