-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to run udp2raw with nftables? #540
Comments
It's mention on the home page: You can always disable
Not really true. On newer linux distribution |
If you really don't want to install the On client side:
you tranlsate it to something like:
and add manually On server side:
you tranlsate it to something like:
and add manually |
okay, I will add instructions in wiki or help page, and add the equivalent nftables commands into |
Thank you! So, the only purpose for firewall rules is to protect Linux stack from processing TCP segments? |
Yes
That usually means the iptables/nftables is not working correctly. Maybe better you install
No, I don't plan to add more step-by-step guides for very specific use cases. User with networking experience should be able to figure out it easily. But below are some hints on the wiki. https://github.com/wangyu-/udp2raw/wiki/udp2raw---wireguard-example-configurations |
The input filter did not work for me. The packet loss rate reached 80%. Finally, I dropped rst packets in the output chain and there is no more packet loss.
|
Hi everyone!
I tried to run udp2raw in Debian 12 unsuccessfully. Based on what I see in udp2raw log, it tries to install iptables rules, which fails, because I have no iptables installed in my systems, I'm wondering why udp2raw tries to do that - iptables is obsolete for a long time already and was replaced by nftables in recent Linux distributions. I don't want to create a mess in the system by installing iptables in addition to nftables. However, I haven't found yet how to run udp2raw at nftables-based systems.
Does anyone know how to do that? Appreciate your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: