Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The issue of multiple ports with kcptun and udp2raw。 #503

Closed
maojianyou opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

The issue of multiple ports with kcptun and udp2raw。 #503

maojianyou opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@maojianyou
Copy link

I am using kcptun in conjunction with udp2raw, and I know that kcptun supports multiple ports. Does udp2raw also support multiple ports?

@HiGarfield
Copy link
Contributor

You can run multiple instances of udp2raw, with each instance using a separate port.

@wangyu-
Copy link
Owner

wangyu- commented Dec 19, 2023

udp2raw doesn't have similiar multiple port as kcptun.

running multiple insntances is the only way.

@maojianyou
Copy link
Author

You can run multiple instances of udp2raw, with each instance using a separate port.

If multiple instances are used, it is equivalent to running multiple udp2raw processes, resulting in a high number of udp2raw instances. Since kcptun only utilizes a single port for service, it would be beneficial if there is an automated mechanism to identify the specific port among, for example, 100 ports, eliminating the need to spawn numerous udp2raw processes unnecessarily.

@maojianyou
Copy link
Author

udp2raw doesn't have similiar multiple port as kcptun.

running multiple insntances is the only way.

If multiple instances are used, it is equivalent to running multiple udp2raw processes, resulting in a high number of udp2raw instances. Since kcptun only utilizes a single port for service, it would be beneficial if there is an automated mechanism to identify the specific port among, for example, 100 ports, eliminating the need to spawn numerous udp2raw processes unnecessarily.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants