-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The issue of multiple ports with kcptun and udp2raw。 #503
Comments
You can run multiple instances of udp2raw, with each instance using a separate port. |
udp2raw doesn't have similiar multiple port as kcptun. running multiple insntances is the only way. |
If multiple instances are used, it is equivalent to running multiple udp2raw processes, resulting in a high number of udp2raw instances. Since kcptun only utilizes a single port for service, it would be beneficial if there is an automated mechanism to identify the specific port among, for example, 100 ports, eliminating the need to spawn numerous udp2raw processes unnecessarily. |
If multiple instances are used, it is equivalent to running multiple udp2raw processes, resulting in a high number of udp2raw instances. Since kcptun only utilizes a single port for service, it would be beneficial if there is an automated mechanism to identify the specific port among, for example, 100 ports, eliminating the need to spawn numerous udp2raw processes unnecessarily. |
I am using kcptun in conjunction with udp2raw, and I know that kcptun supports multiple ports. Does udp2raw also support multiple ports?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: