Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EPUB/A in ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/JWG #57

Open
murata2makoto opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

EPUB/A in ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/JWG #57

murata2makoto opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@murata2makoto
Copy link
Contributor

EPUB/A is a preliminary work item of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/JWG7. EPUB/A is expected to specify (1) which feature of EPUB should be used and avoided for long-term preservation, and (2) the packaging of EPUB publications together with any additional data such as other versions and other documentation into an OAIS Submission Information Package (SIP).

It will be based on two technical specifications:
ISO/IEC TS 22424-1 Digital publishing — EPUB 3 Preservation — Part 1: Principles
ISO/IEC TS 22424-2 Digital publishing — EPUB 3 Preservation — Part 2: Metadata requirements

Alicia Wise who is a leader of preparation PWI regarding EPUB/A gave a presentation in a JWG7 meeting yesterday.

This topic will be discussed in a JWG7 meeting in 2023 May.

This issue was first raised in the
w3c/publ-maintenance-wg-charter#16 (comment)

@TzviyaSiegman
Copy link

Why is this group looking at EPUB 3.0.1 instead of EPUB 3.3?

@murata2makoto
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yesterday, I explained EPUB 3.3, EPUB 3.3 RS, and EPUB A11Y 1.1. Laurent and Crisitina were also present. I am sure people will update the document. But the two TSs I referenced above were published three years ago.

@P5music
Copy link

P5music commented May 14, 2023

There are ePub topics that does not proceed further because of lack of interest by the market and the ePub community, according to what is said in other theads by major contributors.
So this effort was strongly requested or needed instead?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants