Deoplete backend

[expipiplus1]

A deoplete backend would be great. It's often more pleasant then working via omnifunc.

[valpackett]

How is that more pleasant? Shouldn't they display the exact same interface?

intero.nvim is so fast it doesn't need to be used asynchronously.

[expipiplus1]

Deoplete allows quite a lot of configuration.

Perhaps more importantly, it allows displaying completions from various sources at the same time, so one wouldn't be just limited to intero's suggestions.

[valpackett]

Doesn't deoplete have an omnifunc source?

[expipiplus1]

yes, I'm not sure what the state of it is. Last time I used it it wasn't really usable: slow and lacking some functionality.

[rgrinberg]

Deoplete is quite a bit nicer as it does more than just prefix completion.