Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Caballo Fault NM-TX #2

Open
pmpowers-usgs opened this issue Apr 19, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Caballo Fault NM-TX #2

pmpowers-usgs opened this issue Apr 19, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@pmpowers-usgs
Copy link
Member

Migrated from usgs/nshm-cous-2014#41

There are two Caballo faults, one in NM and one in TX. The geodetic modelers did not consider (were not supplied the) Texas faults as a class in 2014. However, it seems the TX Caballo fault variant, with longitudes in the -105° range, was supplied in lieu of the NM variant. The texas faults without geodetic slip rates were generally corrected to receive a weight of 1, however the Caballo fault model is overweighted in TX (the geologic branch weights assume there are no geodetic branches, but there are) and underweighted in NM (the geologic branche weights assume there are geodetic branches, but they're aren't any).

In reformatting 2014 for 2018 we're leaving everything as is.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant