You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Competition across multiple potential measure adoption choices in run must consider additional, state-level regulations on certain types of appliances (e.g., CARB standards, NY gas ban).
Proposed approach:
Create a database that lists assumed restrictions on fossil fuel use by state, building type/vintage (new/existing), fossil fuel type, end use, and start year, with applicability factors to map policies that only affect a portion of the state’s area.
Database could include rows for representing regulations across broad groupings of states (e.g., state = ”leading”; state= “usca”)
In run module competition calculations for each baseline microsegment, use data from (a) to flag competing measures for characteristics that are prohibited under laws affecting appliances, e.g.:
Restricted fossil-based energy use in new buildings where the measure does not electrify.
When a measure is flagged in (b) for a given competed microsegment:
Determine what fraction of the microsegment’s competition the measure should be excluded from (e.g., 100% ban or a ban that applies to X% of the state’s population/building energy)
Pass the fraction determined in (c.i) to the find_added_sbmkt_fracs function, which will remove that portion from competition and distributed it to other competing measures
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Competition across multiple potential measure adoption choices in run must consider additional, state-level regulations on certain types of appliances (e.g., CARB standards, NY gas ban).
Proposed approach:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: