-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing learner (no weight = 0) #232
Comments
I would guess it fails on one of the folds, hence it is removed from the list of learners used when fitting the final weights. |
That makes sense -- it takes a while to run so I've been ensuring lrnrs run on samples. Any ideas on how I could parse out which fold or piece of data its failing on? |
Hmm, so I'm not sure its the case that
In addition, when I ran the same super_learner on a Finally, I ran the following code:
This errors with the following:
That
However, this seems to show the output I'd expect:
|
Just few short comments: for manual checking on which fold it fails, you would want to grab the folds generated by Just from glancing at the error, it looks like |
Hey there,
I fit a model with the following code:
Everything looks good except the
Lrnr_earth_2_3_backward_0_1_0_0
learner, which is specified in the picture below, doesn't exist as part of the weights. It doesn't even have a weight of 0, likelrnr_glm
🤷♂, and yet training works when I uselrnr_earth$train()
manuallyThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: