Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add messages rejection #322

Open
vasilbekk opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Add messages rejection #322

vasilbekk opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@vasilbekk
Copy link

Thank you so much for creating such a cool library, but I found a problem.

rabbitmq has support for dead messages, and taskiq-aio-pika even creates a queue for them.

But in the Receiver implementation in tasker, there is only message.ack(), and there is no option for message.reject()

And in Receiver.callback(), ack() is always called even if the task failed with an error

I rewrote the class a little bit, and added the optional reject() callable field to AckableMessage (I called RejectableMessage), also rewrote the broker so that in listen() it returns RejectableMessage instead of AckableMessage, and rewrote `Receiver.callback() so that in the case of result.is_err it calls reject(), and not ack()

I could clean up a bit and send a PR with message rejection implementation (especially useful in rabbitmq) if needed.

It would also be interesting to get an answer to 2 questions

  1. Why is the creation of a queue for dead messages implemented in taskiq-aio-pika, but it is essentially always empty, was it laid down for the future or broke?

  2. Perhaps there is another implementation of repeating error messages and I do not see it, I would be glad to hear suggestions

@a1d4r
Copy link

a1d4r commented Jul 2, 2024

Hello, Sergey! I've encountered the same problem. I would rather expect sending failing tasks to the dead letter queue rather than ack'ing them. Could you please share a draft PR or a gist? I'm pretty sure it might help many people including me.

@s3rius
Copy link
Member

s3rius commented Jul 6, 2024

Actually, we might have removed this queue. It's here for historical reasons from old versions. But I agree that we might implement reject to all brokers. Can you please publish your changes? And we will go through it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants