From 43f8d7e2c592bfd33c836c734dc39a57cb9a040d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: taras <nomail@nomail>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 18:16:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Bump version

---
 HISTORY.rst        |  4 ++++
 picows/__init__.py |  2 +-
 picows/picows.pyx  | 10 +++++++---
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/HISTORY.rst b/HISTORY.rst
index 0229878..fc1c5eb 100644
--- a/HISTORY.rst
+++ b/HISTORY.rst
@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ picows Release History
    :depth: 1
    :local:
 
+1.2.1 (2024-09-11)
+------------------
+
+* Optimization: Internal memory buffers were calling PyMem_Realloc too often
 
 1.2.0 (2024-09-05)
 ------------------
diff --git a/picows/__init__.py b/picows/__init__.py
index 29ea2bb..8b8b620 100644
--- a/picows/__init__.py
+++ b/picows/__init__.py
@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@
     'PICOWS_DEBUG_LL'
 ]
 
-__version__ = "1.2.0"
+__version__ = "1.2.1"
 __author__ = "Taras Kozlov"
diff --git a/picows/picows.pyx b/picows/picows.pyx
index 63a6c70..051f6b2 100644
--- a/picows/picows.pyx
+++ b/picows/picows.pyx
@@ -778,11 +778,15 @@ cdef class WSProtocol:
         self._process_new_data()
 
     # Benchmark and profiler showed that buffered protocol is actually slower
-    # then normal. There are additional costs of 2 python calls
+    # than normal. There are additional costs of 2 python calls
     # (get_buffer, buffer_updated) comparing to a single data_received.
     # Also extra costs are related to creating memoryview and getting buffer
-    # out of it
-
+    # out of it.
+    #
+    # Uncommenting the following code will make uvloop to think that WSProtocol
+    # implements BufferedProtocol. uvloop will use get_buffer/buffer_updated
+    # instead of data_received.
+    #
     # def get_buffer(self, Py_ssize_t size_hint):
     #     cdef Py_ssize_t sz = size_hint + 1024
     #     if self._buffer.size - self._f_new_data_start_pos < sz: