Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FR: Allow for higher zoom values #2264

Open
Atrate opened this issue May 13, 2021 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #2344
Open

FR: Allow for higher zoom values #2264

Atrate opened this issue May 13, 2021 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #2344

Comments

@Atrate
Copy link

Atrate commented May 13, 2021

Related, downstream issue: streetcomplete/StreetComplete#2878

Use case: When displaying partially overlapping markers on a map, they are often hidden if their position is too close to each other. This often makes it impossible to click/read some markers, especially when the map is at max zoom already.

Proposed solution: Increase the maximum zoom level by 2-3 steps, e.g. to 22 or 23, so that applications can utilize higher zoom levels if they need to.

@nvkelso
Copy link
Member

nvkelso commented May 13, 2021

Some SDKs also allow multiple tap feature picking... like if there are 2 overlapping icons, the first tap brings up the top icon, but the second tap brings up the "hidden" icon.

@Atrate
Copy link
Author

Atrate commented Dec 30, 2022

Is the limitation just a matter of changing a constant or is there some rendering-based blocker?

WebFreak001 added a commit to WebFreak001/tangram-es that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2023
25 in streetcomplete seems to be about 5m for one phone width, probably
higher than what anyone will ever need, but the capability is there now
if users actually want to do this.

fix tangrams#2264
@WebFreak001 WebFreak001 linked a pull request Oct 12, 2023 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants