-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Evaluate status of digital objects in OAC vs. ArchivesSpace #377
Comments
Hi @marlo-longley thanks for ticketing this idea. Here are some things I am interested in learning:
I'm thinking the form of this reporting could be a spreadsheet, similar to what Cory has produced for some of the reporting he's done about published resources and resources in OAC. Let me know if any of this is unclear and I'm happy to explain more! |
Here's a start to my analysis - let's discuss maybe outside Github. Aspace analysis: OAC analysis: |
Excluded from the OAC analysis above are two exceptions (determined in collaboration with Adrian Turner @ CDL): Exception 1: The "1906 Earthquake and Fire" finding aid links to digital objects that are still managed in OAC; the objects were originally created in partnership with UC Berkeley Library/Bancroft and are in the form of METS files:
Exception 2: The "Buckminster Fuller" finding aid also links to digital objects that are still managed in OAC; the objects were programmatically created by extracting the item-level metadata from the EAD, and creating METS files: |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: