Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate status of digital objects in OAC vs. ArchivesSpace #377

Open
marlo-longley opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Evaluate status of digital objects in OAC vs. ArchivesSpace #377

marlo-longley opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@marlo-longley
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@marlo-longley marlo-longley self-assigned this Nov 20, 2023
@dinahhandel
Copy link

Hi @marlo-longley thanks for ticketing this idea. Here are some things I am interested in learning:

  • How many collections in ArchivesSpace contain digital objects? Which collections are they? Is it possible to obtain a count of the number of digital objects? What are the different forms they take (link to PURL, link to SearchWorks, etc.)?
  • How many collections in OAC contain digital objects?
  • Are the collections that have digital objects in OAC and ArchivesSpace the same?

I'm thinking the form of this reporting could be a spreadsheet, similar to what Cory has produced for some of the reporting he's done about published resources and resources in OAC.

Let me know if any of this is unclear and I'm happy to explain more!

@marlo-longley
Copy link
Contributor Author

marlo-longley commented Nov 29, 2023

Here's a start to my analysis - let's discuss maybe outside Github.
Still to do, a diff between the two systems.
I have written python scripts that generate the sheets below; I am not sure if they should be committed to this repository or saved in some way.

Aspace analysis:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ThXfAzK5liJDCeUEG6eBiQ7l9Z91AkqrDO4ilOqhK8k/edit#gid=1978012191

OAC analysis:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11N_7IoiDJXHoqem51ZlylcGaoY2JSqnbS0b2io3yn4E/edit#gid=1312181821

@marlo-longley
Copy link
Contributor Author

marlo-longley commented Nov 29, 2023

Excluded from the OAC analysis above are two exceptions (determined in collaboration with Adrian Turner @ CDL):

Exception 1: The "1906 Earthquake and Fire" finding aid links to digital objects that are still managed in OAC; the objects were originally created in partnership with UC Berkeley Library/Bancroft and are in the form of METS files:

Exception 2: The "Buckminster Fuller" finding aid also links to digital objects that are still managed in OAC; the objects were programmatically created by extracting the item-level metadata from the EAD, and creating METS files:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants