You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's common for sites to include messages that show up when the user has disabled JavaScript (or JavaScript fails to load) and request the user to enable JavaScript in order to fully experience the site, or even access it at all.
At SN we follow progressive enhancement principles so JS being disabled shouldn't be a problem, but there may be a few instances where this could be acceptable.
We need to document this, and suggest an appropriate wording for a message like this that respects the users' choice and doesn't link to external sites.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We've found a few of our sites link to some external webpage like https://enable-javascript.com/ to explain to users how to enable JS - we're not hugely keen on redirecting users to websites that are sponsored by online casinos etc. We've also seen another instance that's supported by shady cryptocurrency advertising, but I don't remember the URL right now. Either way, it's not the sort of thing that a respectable scientific publisher should be linking out to - we don't advertise websites like this on our platform, for obvious reasons, and linking out to sites like this undermines that decision.
If we really must explain to users how to use a computer (and as far as I recall from the meeting where we discussed this, none of us believe it to be necessary), we should be doing that explaining on our own websites so that we can control who we associate ourselves with.
It's common for sites to include messages that show up when the user has disabled JavaScript (or JavaScript fails to load) and request the user to enable JavaScript in order to fully experience the site, or even access it at all.
At SN we follow progressive enhancement principles so JS being disabled shouldn't be a problem, but there may be a few instances where this could be acceptable.
We need to document this, and suggest an appropriate wording for a message like this that respects the users' choice and doesn't link to external sites.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: