Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Talk about author contributions #37

Open
larsvilhuber opened this issue Aug 17, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Talk about author contributions #37

larsvilhuber opened this issue Aug 17, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@larsvilhuber
Copy link
Contributor

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/authorship#loc-author-contributions and https://casrai.org/credit/. While not typical in social sciences (in particular in economics) might warrant a discussion.

The data (and code) authorship != paper authorship is not at all common in Economics. One example I can think of is https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/pol.20170704, with replication package https://doi.org/10.3886/E110642V1 explicitly single-authored by one of the authors. I've also seen some papers (need to dig out references) where Github with code might be "Author A + RA" whereas paper is "Author A + Author B".

The generic guidance I have in mind is https://casrai.org/credit/, which has been adopted by some journals, such as PLOS https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/authorship#loc-author-contributions, where it applies to the paper. If considering the data + the code as distinct first-class research objects, the CRediT taxonomy directly applies there as well, and there's nothing that requires that the two be the same.

@larsvilhuber larsvilhuber self-assigned this Aug 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant