You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you so much Tiago for the multi exposure option.
The lates discussion about multi exposure [https://github.com//discussions/848] got me thinking.
Perhaps it would be a good idea to name the extra exposure passes so the slices can me added by scripting.
Now, every extra pass is just another layer, another number out of thousands.
If possible, naming the layer, e.g. 100.1, meaning layer 100 pass 1, could add additional functionality to this powerful tool. So the script could find a slice bitmap 100.1 and automatically attach it to this particular layer.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
For consideration.
Thank you so much Tiago for the multi exposure option.
The lates discussion about multi exposure [https://github.com//discussions/848] got me thinking.
Perhaps it would be a good idea to name the extra exposure passes so the slices can me added by scripting.
Now, every extra pass is just another layer, another number out of thousands.
If possible, naming the layer, e.g. 100.1, meaning layer 100 pass 1, could add additional functionality to this powerful tool. So the script could find a slice bitmap 100.1 and automatically attach it to this particular layer.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions