Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ES9018 capabilities #408

Open
Abonaif123 opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

ES9018 capabilities #408

Abonaif123 opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Abonaif123
Copy link

The ES9018 is on another level for DACs and there's plenty of documentation for the chip itself, but the problem is when certain 3rd parties release a board that is almost certainly an attempt at a knock-off of the Audiophonics boards for the RPi, which are woefully expensive. There is scant information other than a few screen shots of a configuration menu with the HifiBerry DAC selected. The are a couple of badly translated FAQs, one of which covers the MCLK, which isn't needed. I took a punt but fell short on this one.

Originally posted by @alidaf in #395 (reply in thread)

@sle118 sle118 changed the title The ES9018 is on another level for DACs and there's plenty of documentation for the chip itself, but the problem is when certain 3rd parties release a board that is almost certainly an attempt at a knock-off of the Audiophonics boards for the RPi, which are woefully expensive. There is scant information other than a few screen shots of a configuration menu with the HifiBerry DAC selected. The are a couple of badly translated FAQs, one of which covers the MCLK, which isn't needed. I took a punt but fell short on this one. ES9018 capabilities Apr 9, 2024
@sle118
Copy link
Owner

sle118 commented Apr 9, 2024

What is the intent of this issue? Not sure I see the point

@alidaf
Copy link

alidaf commented Apr 9, 2024

I really don't know since I got it working with some help in the original post and it had nothing to do with the code. This is just a suspicious copy-paste so I'd suggest closing it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants