Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Various minor formatting and wording fixes. Added missing description for set_oversampling #1268

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

acli
Copy link

@acli acli commented May 27, 2024

  • Added description for set_oversampling interactive command
  • Various minor wording fixes
  • Various minor formatting fixes
    • Manual section title should be just “sfizz” (or left out)
    • Description in name section should not be capped
    • In synopsis section, constant parts should be bolded and variables should be in italics
    • Added bold and italics for options in other sections as appropriate

@@ -1,31 +1,34 @@
.TH sfizz_jack 1 "@MAN_TODAY@" "@CMAKE_PROJECT_VERSION@" "sfizz_jack man page"
.TH sfizz_jack 1 "@MAN_TODAY@" "@CMAKE_PROJECT_VERSION@" "sfizz"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm clueless about man pages. This changes the title of the page?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It changes the section title (the page title remains “sfizz_jack”). It used to say it belonged to the “sfizz_jack man page” section, which made little sense; the patch changes it to say it belongs to the “sfizz” section.

.SH SYNOPSIS
sfizz_jack [FILE] [OPTIONS...]
.B sfizz_jack
[\fIFILE\fR] [\fIOPTIONS\fR...]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

\fI is "start italic" and \fR is "start regular"?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Instead of \fR I believe we can also say \fP (previous font, probably; I’ll need to dig out the manual to be sure), which undoes the most recent font change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants