Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support other architectures #27

Open
unixfox opened this issue Mar 1, 2020 · 13 comments
Open

Support other architectures #27

unixfox opened this issue Mar 1, 2020 · 13 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@unixfox
Copy link
Member

unixfox commented Mar 1, 2020

EDIT: Fixed in https://github.com/searxng/searxng-docker if anyone is interested.


If #26 get merged then it's one step towards supporting other architectures because the Docker image lucaslorentz/caddy-docker-proxy supports ARM devices.
filtron and morty can be compiled in ARM too because Golang support it. And searx and searx-checker are using python so they can be switched to use the alpine ARM base image.

@unixfox unixfox changed the title Supports other architectures Support other architectures Mar 1, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 6, 2020

I would like support for PPC64LE as well

@dalf dalf added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jul 27, 2020
@SuperSandro2000
Copy link

filtron and morty can be compiled in ARM too because Golang support it. And searx and searx-checker are using python so they can be switched to use the alpine ARM base image.

I would suggest to use Debian because it has more prebuilts which makes building easier.

@samuel-p
Copy link

I just could successfully build the Searx Docker Image on arm without any modifications:

git clone https://github.com/searx/searx.git
cd searx/
./manage.sh docker_build

So I think we just need to update the CI Docker builds to also build it for arm (or others) and publish it to Docker-Hub.

@dalf
Copy link
Contributor

dalf commented Sep 30, 2020

Reading https://www.docker.com/blog/multi-arch-build-what-about-travis/

I have this script for travis:

# install the last docker verison (for travis, according to the article, not tested)
sudo rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
curl -fsSL https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu/gpg | sudo apt-key add -
sudo add-apt-repository "deb [arch=amd64] https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu $(lsb_release -cs) edge"
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get -y -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confnew" install docker-ce

# install & setup buildx
mkdir -vp ~/.docker/cli-plugins/
curl --silent -L "https://github.com/docker/buildx/releases/download/v0.4.2/buildx-v0.4.2.linux-amd64" > ~/.docker/cli-plugins/docker-buildx
chmod a+x ~/.docker/cli-plugins/docker-buildx
# to avoid "invalid non-bool value for BUILDX_NO_DEFAULT_LOAD:" :
# docker buildx create --use --name multi-arch --driver-opt image=moby/buildkit:master
docker buildx create --use
docker run --rm --privileged multiarch/qemu-user-static --reset -p yes

# build searx image
docker buildx build --platform linux/amd64,linux/arm64,linux/ppc64le --tag dalf/searx:buildx-latest .

# it fails with linux/arm

The docker buildx command is only for the test, it should be here https://github.com/searx/searx/blob/fd5fe369844e481aecc0d731b08ee8b29c9b47e6/manage.sh#L154

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link

SuperSandro2000 commented Oct 1, 2020

I just use the following setup for buildx in travis:

.travis.yaml

env:
  global:
    - DOCKER_CLI_EXPERIMENTAL=enabled
    - DOCKER_BUILDKIT=1
...
      - mkdir -p /etc/docker/
      - |
        echo -e '{"experimental": true}' | sudo tee /etc/docker/daemon.json
      - curl -fsSL https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu/gpg | sudo apt-key add -
      - sudo add-apt-repository "deb https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu $(lsb_release -cs) stable"
      - sudo apt-get install -qy docker-ce
      # log into Docker HUB
      - echo ${DOCKER_PASSWORD} | docker login -u ${DOCKER_USERNAME} --password-stdin
      # enable multiarch
      - docker run --rm --privileged multiarch/qemu-user-static --reset -p yes
      # create builder for buildx
      - docker buildx create --use --name build --node build --driver-opt network=host

@dalf
Copy link
Contributor

dalf commented Oct 3, 2020

Thank you for the configuration.

I have create dalf/searx@docker-buildx branch:

Output here:
https://travis-ci.org/github/dalf/searx/jobs/732563796

Unfortunately, the build takes forever and timeout.

Most probably pyopenssl can be removed from the dependencies (since searx/searx#2199 ), but anyway even lxml is a problem (and this one is mandatory).


[EDIT] There is https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/multi-cpu-architectures/

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link

SuperSandro2000 commented Oct 4, 2020

You probably need to find a pypi repository which has this as a prebuilt. Alternatively you would need to setup a pipeline where you prebuilt this package and upload it to a pypi server.

I am doing the same for arm for this Image https://github.com/SuperSandro2000/docker-images/blob/master/reddiscord/Dockerfile#L45 https://github.com/SuperSandro2000/docker-images/blob/master/reddiscord/files/pip.conf.

I am using this repo to built the wheels and this pypiserver to host them.

This would probably take quite some time if there is nothing like https://www.piwheels.org/ for ppc64le.

If you need help with any of the above feel free to reach out to me.

@avpnusr
Copy link

avpnusr commented Dec 29, 2020

I'm not as deep in CI/CD workflows, as you guys seem to be :)

However, I could successfully build the docker-images for armv6, armv7, arm64 (ppc is building at the moment), using the github workflow integrations: https://github.com/avpnusr/searx/blob/master/.github/workflows/update-build.yml
As @dalf said, it runs forever (more than 1 hour), but it finishes with a working docker-image.
https://hub.docker.com/r/avpnusr/searx/tags

As far as i can see from your links above, Travis does not support armv6 armv7, but only arm64 and ppc64.

The image from github workflow works, as I run it on a RaspberryPi 3B+ .

Perhaps this helps in any way?

@unixfox
Copy link
Member Author

unixfox commented Dec 29, 2020

Yes with docker buildx you can build for a lot of architectures. Searx could switch to it using Github actions.

@dalf
Copy link
Contributor

dalf commented Jan 11, 2021

It is possible to speed lxml install / compilation:
pip install lxml --global-option="build_ext" --global-option="-j3"

Moreover, there is no need to install pyopenssl : see https://github.com/psf/requests/blob/master/HISTORY.md#2250-2020-11-11 ( requests[security] is deprecated ).

@avpnusr
Copy link

avpnusr commented Jan 25, 2021

Looking at

* https://github.com/searx/searx/blob/master/.github/workflows/integration.yml#L86-L117

* https://github.com/searx/searx/blob/5fb9a5c7c10252b21a23fe66e1625ed9f8691b4a/manage.sh#L154-L163

few things are missing.

Sorry, took me a while, to get back to this :)

As far as I can see, you mean the missing build variables in the dockerx command.
I tried to integrate them into the github actions workflow and testing a build at the moment.

Regarding the installation of the lxml via pip - do you know, where i have to comment the lxml build out?
Is it enough to comment out in the requirements.txt and insert the "pip install lxml [...]" command in the Dockerfile, or does this dependency come from another place?

@unixfox
Copy link
Member Author

unixfox commented Apr 27, 2022

Fixed in https://github.com/searxng/searxng-docker if anyone is interested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants