You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently a lot of tests use a list of metric learners and their dataset, defined at the top of test_utils. The problem is that there is no difference currently between a list of all metric learners and a list of mahalanobis metric learners. This is fine for now because there are no not Mahalanobis metric learners, but it will be problematic when we have one, because then some tests that are made only for Mahalanobis metric learners should be ran only on such metric learners. This will force to look through the tests to separate those for mahalanobis and those that are not for mahalanobis. Right now, tests for mahalanobis metric learners are in test_mahalanobis_mixin, so it will not be difficult eventually, but I think it's good to do the change now that there are not so much tests.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently a lot of tests use a list of metric learners and their dataset, defined at the top of
test_utils
. The problem is that there is no difference currently between a list of all metric learners and a list of mahalanobis metric learners. This is fine for now because there are no not Mahalanobis metric learners, but it will be problematic when we have one, because then some tests that are made only for Mahalanobis metric learners should be ran only on such metric learners. This will force to look through the tests to separate those for mahalanobis and those that are not for mahalanobis. Right now, tests for mahalanobis metric learners are intest_mahalanobis_mixin
, so it will not be difficult eventually, but I think it's good to do the change now that there are not so much tests.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: