Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch project to use tools.deps.alpha #28

Open
ezmiller opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Switch project to use tools.deps.alpha #28

ezmiller opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ezmiller
Copy link
Contributor

We had a discussion with Florian who works on PinkGorilla etc who suggested that we might be able to use tools.deps.alpha and shed leinigen and that there are real benefits for doing that because tools.deps handles dependency conflicts in a much better way. Unlike leinigen, which pulls in the version of a dependency that is first referenced by some other dependency, tools.deps resolves common dependencies and takes the most recent. This can save end users a lot of time.

@ezmiller ezmiller added the enhancement New feature or request label May 19, 2021
@awb99
Copy link

awb99 commented Jun 26, 2021

https://github.com/pink-gorilla/nrepl-middleware

I just refactored this project from leiningen to tools.deps.

https://github.com/clojure-quant/trateg/blob/master/demo/deps.edn
in trateg I do experiments with using local only projects. The link is a demo project that uses the library I am building.
But it consumes it directly without needing to publish on clojars.
Also the aot stuff in demo is separate from main library

In the notebook I go one step further. I publish two artefacs rom one git repo. >And the deps.edn file for the second artefact is generated by code: https://github.com/pink-gorilla/notebook/blob/master/src/pinkgorilla/bconfig.clj

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants